[NOT OPEN YET]

Challenge #6: Understanding Impermanent Loss Over Time

Impermanent Loss (IL) is one of the most significant risks faced by liquidity providers (LPs) in Automated Market Makers (AMMs) like Uniswap. Uniswap v3's concentrated liquidity model offers enhanced capital efficiency, but also introduces complexities that can amplify IL, especially when prices move outside of a set liquidity range. Building off of challenge #4, this challenge aims to explore and quantify IL across time and under various conditions in Uniswap v3, understand its Total Addressable Market (TAM), and investigate strategies that LPs might employ to mitigate IL while maximizing returns.

Challenge Objectives

1. Quantifying Impermanent Loss:
   • Calculate IL for major Uniswap v3 pools over time, focusing on how concentrated liquidity impacts IL compared to the traditional constant product model in v2.
   • Explore IL under different market conditions, including varying levels of price volatility and trading volume.
   • Analyze the relationship between IL and other key metrics, such as fee income and trading volume, to understand how LPs are compensated for the risk of IL.
2. IL Across Time and Volatility:
   • Perform time-series analysis of IL, examining how IL fluctuates over different time periods (e.g., daily, weekly) and during periods of high market volatility.
   • Compare IL patterns across Uniswap v2 and v3, as well as across major L2 networks like Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base.
3. Total Addressable Market (TAM) of Impermanent Loss:
   • Estimate the TAM of IL across Uniswap v2 and v3 pools, accounting for factors such as liquidity depth, trading volume, and volatility.
   • Compare TAM estimates between Ethereum mainnet and various L2s, highlighting how network-specific factors (e.g., gas prices, block times) influence IL.
4. Mitigation Strategies:
   • Propose strategies for mitigating IL, including adjusting liquidity ranges, dynamic rebalancing, and utilizing advanced market-making tools.
   • Simulate the potential impact of these strategies on IL, and evaluate their effectiveness in reducing the TAM of IL.
5. Behavioral Insights and LP Adaptations:
   • Investigate how LPs adjust their strategies in response to IL, such as changing liquidity ranges or exiting positions during high volatility.
   • Analyze LP behavior across different networks and pool types, identifying patterns that suggest optimal practices for minimizing IL.
6. Visualizing Impermanent Loss:
   • Develop visualizations that illustrate IL trends, including comparisons between v2 and v3, and across different networks.
   • Create interactive tools that allow users to explore IL under various scenarios, such as changing price ranges, volatility levels, and trading volumes.

Ultimately, these are all just options for you. Even a single chart with thoughtful analysis can be insightful. Your may feel free to explore one or a few of these objectives.

Expected Outcomes & Deliverables

• Detailed calculations of IL for major Uniswap v2 and v3 pools, with insights on how concentrated liquidity affects IL.
• Time-series analysis of IL, showing patterns related to time-of-day, market volatility, and network-specific factors.
• TAM estimates for IL across Uniswap v2 and v3, with a comparison of mainnet and L2 networks.
• Proposed strategies for mitigating IL, supported by simulations and effectiveness evaluations.
• Interactive visualizations and dashboards illustrating IL trends, TAM estimates, and strategy simulations.